After weeks of debate and contention, a divided
Howard County Board of Education approved a new middle school program of studies Thursday, by a vote of 5-3.
Two
weeks ago, the plan stalled when a 4-4 board vote forced school
officials to revise a proposal that would set the middle school schedule
at a uniform 50-minute, seven-period day and eliminate stand alone
reading classes. The proposal is part of a massive curriculum shift
placing literacy instruction in each of the schools' content areas.
Board
member Brian Meshkin, who had voted against the proposal Jan. 26, voted
in favor of the revised proposal, which would require some level of
reading instruction for sixth-graders who read at grade level.
Under the final revised plan, students would not have traditional
reading classes, but would have the option of taking literacy-based
courses, two quarters of which would be required for sixth-graders who
did not score "advanced" on the fifth-grade Maryland State Assessment
reading exam, and who were not already in reading interventions or
seminars.
One of those courses would teach the "nuts and bolts of reading skills," board Chairwoman Sandra French said.
That
compromise wasn't enough to convince three of the four members who
voted against the proposal two weeks ago, who voted against the proposal
Thursday night, citing the elimination of reading.
"I don't see
this as a compromise," student member Tomi Williams said. "Two quarters,
out of three years of middle school — it doesn't seem like a balanced,
compromised position in my opinion."
Beyond the debate over the middle school schedule and reading, another debate arose Thursday over the nature of Meshkin's vote.
Meshkin
voted by phone, from California, where his business is located. But
before he voted, he told board members he had first been told he would
be unable to vote by video or teleconference because that would be a
violation of the board's handbook, which states that a board member
cannot vote by proxy or in abstentia.
Meshkin had previously
stated that if did not see a better compromise on the program of
studies, he would again vote against it, again causing a split vote.
Both
Mark Blom, the school system's general counsel, and Judith Bresler, the
board's attorney, advised French that Meshkin would be legally able to
participate and vote during Thursday's meeting, Meshkin said.
The
board unanimously voted around 6 p.m. — nearly three hours before
discussion on the middle school program of studies began — to allow
Meshkin to vote.
Meshkin said he was concerned about the decision. "My
concern is that the only reason I was allowed to vote, was to get me as
the fifth vote," he said. "That's conduct unbecoming of board members.
... You don't get to throw a member in the dungeon and let them out when
you need a vote."